Skip to main content
Home
for DLMS smart meters
Open source solutions for DLMS smart metering

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Products
  • About us
  • Open Source
  • Community
  • Forum
  • Downloads
User account menu
  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Forums
  3. Support For Method Update_amount (data) In Credit Class

Support for method update_amount (data) in Credit class

Forum Rules

Before commenting read Forum rules

Don't comment the topic if you have a new question.

You can create a new topic selecting correct category from Gurux Forum and then create a new topic selecting "New Topic" from the top left.

By Martin Wick , 2 October, 2020
Forums
DLMSDirector

I would like the invoke method 1, update_amount (data) in one of my credit objects. I can't figure out how to do this.
Do you support that service, and if no, do you intend to add support?
Thanks in advance, Martin

Profile picture for user Kurumi

Kurumi

5 years 8 months ago

Hi Martin,

Hi Martin,

I just checked and update_amount, set_amount_to_value, and invoke_credit are not implemented to GXDLMSDirector. We'll add them to the next release. It's released at the end of this week.
BR,
Mikko

Martin Wick

5 years 8 months ago

In reply to Hi Martin, by Kurumi

Sounds great, thank you

Sounds great, thank you

Profile picture for user Kurumi

Kurumi

5 years 8 months ago

Hi,

Hi,

A new version is released where this is fixed.

BR,
Mikko

Martin Wick

3 years 8 months ago

Hi,

Hi,
with GXDLMSDirector, writing attribute execution_time of an Single action schedule objects returns an error. I assume the reason for this is, that the 'hundredths' part of time is set to 0xFF.
GB Part2, page 49 states: "For hour, minute, second and hundredths: 0xFF = not specified."
See file for transmission.
Thanks in advance

Image
Profile picture for user Kurumi

Kurumi

3 years 8 months ago

Hi Martin,

Hi Martin,

"not specified" works with most of the meters and it basically means that it's ignored: I know that some meters expect that hundreds are set to zero. Is this the case with your meter?

BR,
Mikko

Martin Wick

3 years 8 months ago

Hi Mikko,

Hi Mikko,
we would like to be as close to the specification as possible. This helps us in the In case if/when the DLMS conformance test gets more strict and would fail with this violation (even though it is small)

Profile picture for user Kurumi

Kurumi

3 years 8 months ago

Hi,

Hi,

Then you need to handle this on the meter and if it's oxFF you need to skip it.
You can find more information from this in the Blue Book 4.1.6.1 Date and time formats.

BR,
Mikko

Martin Wick

3 years 8 months ago

Hi,

Hi,
I miss read the information in Blue Book 4.1.6.1.
I'll implement as you suggest. Thanks a lot for your help.
BR, Martin

  • Create new account
  • Reset your password

Hire Us!

Latest Releases

  • Tue, 06/09/2026 - 11:16
    gurux.dlms.java 4.0.95
  • Tue, 06/09/2026 - 10:03
    Gurux.DLMS.Python 1.0.199
  • Mon, 06/08/2026 - 13:39
    gurux.dlms.cpp 9.0.2606.0801
  • Mon, 06/01/2026 - 10:15
    gurux.dlms.cpp 9.0.2606.0101
  • Thu, 05/28/2026 - 16:06
    gurux.dlms.java 4.0.94

New forum topics

  • Error reading L&G Meter
  • Pass a TCP Client to GXNet
  • Australian EDMI Mk10D (Essential Energy area)
  • Strange mix of data notificiation vs get response
  • DLMS Connection
More

Who's new

  • Tuanhgg
  • Adel
  • charnon
  • Paddles
  • Miguel Ángel
RSS feed
Privacy FAQ GXDN Issues Contact
Follow Gurux on Twitter Follow Gurux on Linkedin