Skip to main content
Home
for DLMS smart meters
Open source solutions for DLMS smart metering

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Products
  • About us
  • Open Source
  • Community
  • Forum
  • Downloads
User account menu
  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Forums
  3. Proposed-dlms-version-number = 7

proposed-dlms-version-number = 7

Forum Rules

Before commenting read Forum rules

Don't comment the topic if you have a new question.

You can create a new topic selecting correct category from Gurux Forum and then create a new topic selecting "New Topic" from the top left.

By rajacms , 6 March, 2021
Forums
General discussion

Dear Mikko,

CTT Test case also passed Or not

1.test case failed while proposed-dlms-version-number = 7, CTT VERSION 106 AND 107

2.General Block Transfer(GBT)(In US Association) not implemented in their GURUX Stack as memory constraint might exist

Profile picture for user Kurumi

Kurumi

5 years 8 months ago

Dear,

Dear,

1 proposed-dlms-version-number = 7, release 107.
0'35.884 VERDICT: 2: proposed-dlms-version-number = 7 PASSED

This test is using 4 bytes addressing. Try to connect to the meter with GXDLMSDirector. I checked the values that you are using in the _CTI file. Set physical address to 255 and logical address to 1. If this fails, modify svr_isTarget for your needs.

2. GBT is using a lot of memory if ciphering is used because all data must be read to the memory before data is encrypted and sent to the client. This is a killer because ciphering is applied to the complete APDU and then ciphered data is sent as data blocks. Read more from the Green Book: 9.1.4.4.5 Transferring long messages

This is a big problem when you want to read thousands of rows from the profile generic. I believe that there is not enough memory in any consumer meter to do this.

BR,
Mikko

rajacms

5 years 7 months ago

Dear Mikko,

Dear Mikko,

how to test proposed-dlms-version-number = 7, release 107.
and in server.c why need following code....
else if (ret == 0 && result == DLMS_ASSOCIATION_RESULT_ACCEPTED)
{
if (settings->base.dlmsVersionNumber < 6)
{

Profile picture for user Kurumi

Kurumi

5 years 7 months ago

Hi,

Hi,

Please, don't modify the framework. Make all the changes for the main application.
That code will handle the previous test for proposed-dlms-version-number = 5.

Can you connect to the meter using GXLMSDirector if you set the Physical address to 256 and the logical address to 1. I believe that is the problem.

BR,
Mikko

  • Create new account
  • Reset your password

Hire Us!

Latest Releases

  • Tue, 10/13/2026 - 12:00
    gurux.dlms.java 4.0.97
  • Tue, 09/22/2026 - 14:02
    Gurux.DLMS.Net 9.0.2609.2201
  • Mon, 09/21/2026 - 10:18
    Gurux.DLMS.Net 9.0.2609.2101
  • Wed, 08/26/2026 - 09:04
    Gurux.DLMS.Python 1.0.203
  • Mon, 08/17/2026 - 11:28
    Gurux.DLMS.Python 1.0.202

New forum topics

  • Association refresh related issue
  • Need RJ45 pin configuration for Saral 300 and Saral 305 Secure meters
  • Query Regarding Class 63 Status Mapping Support in Gurux DLMS Python
  • Inhemeter
  • DLMS Server - Profile Generic - can't add too many items to profile generic capture object - how to set maximum profile entries
More

Who's new

  • amir.jradi
  • JOEBID€N123
  • yogibear
  • Eric@li
  • Asier Sierra
RSS feed
Privacy FAQ GXDN Issues Contact
Follow Gurux on Twitter Follow Gurux on Linkedin