Before commenting read Forum rules
Don't comment the topic if you have a new question.
You can create a new topic selecting correct category from Gurux Forum and then create a new topic selecting "New Topic" from the top left.
Forums
Hi
I found a issue in indian standard mode, 15959 explained that in LLS data transfer only using the encryption, only during AA eatabishment using authentication and encryption, but now version, DLMSDirector only have select item for all the stage(means AA and data transfer). so we have below issue
in MR association. could you check the issue, thanks!
Image
Hi,
Hi,
I have IS 15959. Can you tell on what page this information is? The meter that we are using for testing is using authentication and encryption all the time.
BR,
Mikko
BR,
Mikko
IS 15959 part2 table 2
IS 15959 part2 table 2
Hi,
Hi,
Only encryption is used with MR, but the meter that was used for testing is using Encryption all the time. It doesn't start with authentication and encryption and then changes to encryption.
The security Policy level is defined in the Security setup object and that security policy must be used.
Can you read the meter if you change Security from AuthenticationEncryption to Encryption?
You can change this in the "Secured Connections" tab.
BR,
Mikko
Meter
Hi,
Hi,
AA eatabishment must using authentication and encryption, means gurux connection must set authentication and encryption,but if connection finished ,when we need reading,the "Secured Connections" tab could not set again.
Hi,
Hi,
You can't change the Security policy after the connection is established. We are reading several IS meters and your meter is different than others if your meter operates like this.
BR,
Mikko
Hi,
Hi,
Could you add a Security policy table to config after connection established, this is more flexible. as ctt3.1
do like this: start with authentication and encryption with AA establish and then change to encryption in
data transfer(MR association).
Hi,
Hi,
any news for this issue?
Hi,
Hi,
I'm thinking about this. In general, this is a security issue and this is the reason why this check was added.
At the moment I believe that there will be an option that ignores check of the security policy change.
BR,
Mikko
Hi,
Hi,
Thank you for your concern!