I am using the latest NuGet package version of Gurux.Common (v8.1.2002.1903), but the list of available classes etc. is smaller than I can see in the source code on GitHub. Also, in GXDLMSDirector, which references Gurux.Common.dll directly, the available classes list looks complete. You can also see this when using Visual Studio's ObjectBrowser on this DLL for both the GXDLMSDirector and my solution which is using the package. As an example, I am trying to use the class 'GXAsyncWork' but cannot see it in my solution, even though I copied some code using it directly from GXDLMSDirector.
How is it possible that the DLL installed by the package appears different to the 'raw' one? Is it really missing from the package, or maybe in another package? or am I just doing something wrong?
Since my question, I have discovered that the class in question (GXAsyncWork) is actually in some variants of the Gurux.Common DLL, i.e. appears to be in the .NET Framework versions, but not in the .NET Core/Standard ones. What is the a reason for this?
Thanks.
GXAsyncWork doesn't support .Net Core and it's not visible for that reason. There is a LONG history of this class but we haven't used it with .Net Core. I need to think should .Net Core support added for GXAsyncWork.
Since my question, I have
Since my question, I have discovered that the class in question (GXAsyncWork) is actually in some variants of the Gurux.Common DLL, i.e. appears to be in the .NET Framework versions, but not in the .NET Core/Standard ones. What is the a reason for this?
Thanks.
Hi,
Hi,
GXAsyncWork doesn't support .Net Core and it's not visible for that reason. There is a LONG history of this class but we haven't used it with .Net Core. I need to think should .Net Core support added for GXAsyncWork.
BR,
Mikko