Skip to main content
Home
for DLMS smart meters
Open source solutions for DLMS smart metering

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Products
  • About us
  • Open Source
  • Community
  • Forum
  • Downloads
User account menu
  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Forums
  3. Suite1 : Signature Not Get Applied To XDLMS APDU Even If Checked "Sign Initiate Request Response" Option

Suite1 : signature not get applied to xDLMS APDU even if checked "Sign initiate request response" option

Forum Rules

Before commenting read Forum rules

Don't comment the topic if you have a new question.

You can create a new topic selecting correct category from Gurux Forum and then create a new topic selecting "New Topic" from the top left.

By aoudumbarpawar , 8 May, 2022
Forums
General discussion

Dear Sir,

After long time trying to communicate with meter in suite1 using digital signing but it seems that
event if "Sign initiate request and response" option in security connection tab, Digital signature is not applied to the xDLMS APDU i.e user information in the AARQ by Gurux Director.

Can please help to provide info to apply digital signature to xDLMS APDU in AARQ APDU.

BR,
Aoudumbar Pawar

Image

aoudumbarpawar

4 years 2 months ago

Dear Sir,

Dear Sir,
Can please help to provide one release with application of sign initiate request response in AARQ and AARE?

it will be very helpful for me.

BR,
AP

aoudumbarpawar

4 years 2 months ago

Dear Sir,

Dear Sir,
waiting for your valuable reply.

BR,
AP

Profile picture for user Kurumi

Kurumi

4 years 2 months ago

Hi Aoudumbar Pawar,

Hi Aoudumbar Pawar,

This is on the worklist, but it will take some time because our clients are keeping us busy with some new features at the moment. I can't say the exact day when this is released.

BR,
Mikko

vishvender

3 years 8 months ago

Hi Mikko,

Hi Mikko,
we are experiencing similar issue , i.e. Our meter is expecting Digital signature in AARQ when configured for Security policy Digital_Signed_Request and Digital_Signed_Response .

Is there any recent update on supporting this feature in Gurux DLMS director ?

Thanks & regards
Vishvender

Profile picture for user Kurumi

Kurumi

3 years 8 months ago

Hi Vishvender,

Hi Vishvender,

Digital signing updates are on the worklist but I can't say the exact day when this is released.

BR,
Mikko

  • Create new account
  • Reset your password

Hire Us!

Latest Releases

  • Mon, 07/27/2026 - 12:37
    gurux.dlms.cpp 9.0.2607.2701
  • Thu, 07/23/2026 - 16:19
    gurux.dlms.java 4.0.96
  • Thu, 07/09/2026 - 14:34
    Gurux.DLMS.Python 1.0.201
  • Fri, 06/26/2026 - 16:32
    Gurux.Service 3.0.2606.2601
  • Wed, 06/24/2026 - 08:36
    Gurux.DLMS.Python 1.0.200

New forum topics

  • Possible memory leak in file dlms.c, getCompactArrayItem(), getCompactArrayItem2()
  • Official Gurux.DLMS.Client.Example.Net fails during High GMAC secure association (Invalid PDU), while Gurux Director connects successfully
  • gurux_dlms.GXDateTime.GXDateTime object Error in Python
  • T_APPL_DATA_LN_N1 subtest 3 fails on an LN-only server regardless of the response to a non-existing-object GET
  • Version mismatch between Gurux.DLMS 9.x and Gurux.Common/Gurux.Serial 8.x
More

Who's new

  • xkQAHLRbrboWkI…
  • RBCLQVpfdDeeYPPbKksI
  • eZDLCKpzJAzARY…
  • RicardoNoula
  • ScottKit
RSS feed
Privacy FAQ GXDN Issues Contact
Follow Gurux on Twitter Follow Gurux on Linkedin