Skip to main content
Home
for DLMS smart meters
Open source solutions for DLMS smart metering

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Products
  • About us
  • Open Source
  • Community
  • Forum
  • Downloads
User account menu
  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Forums
  3. Use of The MaxReceivePDUSize Parameter

Use of the MaxReceivePDUSize Parameter

Forum Rules

Before commenting read Forum rules

Don't comment the topic if you have a new question.

You can create a new topic selecting correct category from Gurux Forum and then create a new topic selecting "New Topic" from the top left.

By Nico , 6 July, 2016
Forums
Gurux DLMS for Java

Hello,

When reading the AARQ message, it seems that the server does not handle the MaxReceivePDUSize - it is simply ignored:

From GXAPDU.java: parseUserInformation()
if (settings.isServer()) {
data.getUInt16(); /* NTO: Server does not care about the MaxReceivePDUSize required by the Server ??!! */
} else {
settings.setMaxReceivePDUSize(data.getUInt16());
}

On the other hand, the client seems to split the received data into multiple DLMS objects to respect this behaviour - from the client point of view:

GXDLMSClient.java: readList()
// Request service primitive shall always fit in a single APDU.
int pos = 0, count = (settings.getMaxReceivePDUSize() - 12) / 10;

My questions are:
- Is my understanding correct ?
- Is there a way to force the server to send directly fragmented Cosem obects back to the client ?

Thank you for your help.

Profile picture for user Kurumi

Kurumi

9 years 11 months ago

Use of the MaxReceivePDUSize Parameter

Hi,

Client can propose PDU size, but it's skipped at the moment and Server PDU size is used .

You can set PDU for server like this:

server.setMaxReceivePDUSize(62);

BR,

Mikko

Nico

9 years 11 months ago

In reply to Use of the MaxReceivePDUSize Parameter by Kurumi

Hello Mikko,

Hello Mikko,
Thanks for your reply.

It looks that forcing the MaxPduSize on the server side will only work when building LN messages, but is not used for SN ones.
Can you please confirm or infirm that the server is able to build Short Name multiblock messages ?

Thanks you

  • Create new account
  • Reset your password

Hire Us!

Latest Releases

  • Tue, 06/09/2026 - 11:16
    gurux.dlms.java 4.0.95
  • Tue, 06/09/2026 - 10:03
    Gurux.DLMS.Python 1.0.199
  • Mon, 06/08/2026 - 13:39
    gurux.dlms.cpp 9.0.2606.0801
  • Mon, 06/01/2026 - 10:15
    gurux.dlms.cpp 9.0.2606.0101
  • Thu, 05/28/2026 - 16:06
    gurux.dlms.java 4.0.94

New forum topics

  • Error reading L&G Meter
  • Pass a TCP Client to GXNet
  • Australian EDMI Mk10D (Essential Energy area)
  • Strange mix of data notificiation vs get response
  • DLMS Connection
More

Who's new

  • Tuanhgg
  • Adel
  • charnon
  • Paddles
  • Miguel Ángel
RSS feed
Privacy FAQ GXDN Issues Contact
Follow Gurux on Twitter Follow Gurux on Linkedin